| Sub-problem 1b - Page 3 of 7 | ID# C401B03 | 
      
      
     
    Sub-problem 1b: Analysis of 
    the Eastbound Freeway Section
    
    The basic freeway analysis methodology is shown in
    Exhibit 4-11. The inputs 
    required include 
    geometric data, a
    free-flow speed (FFS) (or a free flow speed derived from a 
    basic free-flow speed) and volume information. The left-hand branch 
    addresses actions you have to take to obtain the free-flow speed while the 
    right hand branch focuses on the computation of a peak 15-minute flow rate. 
    We’ll consider the left-hand branch first. 
    
    Free-flow speed (FFS) 
    can be measured in the field or estimated using the procedure outlined in 
    Chapter 23. We’ll consider 
    both. 
    
    The benefit of having speed-flow 
    data as shown in
    Exhibit 4-8 in this case study is that we can select a FFS and no adjustments 
    are necessary. If you look at that 
    figure, you can see that a
    value in the range of 55 mph is a good 
    choice. This range reflects the  average maximum speed when the flow rate 
    relatively low. We’ll assume that 55 mph is the right value.
    
    However, it’s useful to see what FFS estimate we would get if we trace 
    through the branch labeled "if BFFS is input." We then take a basic 
    free-flow speed (BFFS) and make adjustments to it to account for lane width, 
    the number of lanes, the interchange density, and lateral clearances.
    Nominally, the basic free flow speed (BFFS) 
    is how fast vehicles are traveling when the volumes are very light. The HCM 
    assumes the BFFS is BFFS is 70 mph in urban settings and 75 mph in rural 
    settings.
    Exhibit 4-8 shows that both of these values are too high for this 
    facility. The maximum speed when the flow is almost zero is about 60 mph. 
    The HCM allows us to use a local value rather than the defaults. We’re going 
    to do that and assume the BFFS is 60 mph.
    [
    Back ] [ Continue ] with 
    Sub-problem 1b