Case Study 1: Overview,
Introduction, and Getting Started
Home
> Overview Overview
[ Back ] [ Continue ] with
Sub-problem |
Page Break
[../introduction/introduction.htm]
Page Break
[../introduction/introduction2.htm]
Page Break
Home
>
Getting Started > Page 1 of 5 Getting Started
Printable Overview, Introduction, and Getting Started As we begin this case study, we will
consider several issues, including the scope of the analysis that we will
undertake, the stakeholders and the issues that are important to them, the
goal of the case study, the performance measures that we will use to support
this decision-making process, the analyses that we will perform to generate
our performance measures, the tools that we will use, the data that is
required, and some of the technical issues with respect to the Highway
Capacity Manual that are included in each problem. Click here to
see what kinds of problems will be considered as part of this case study.
Scope of the Analysis Our major focus is the intersection of
U.S. 95 with Styner Avenue and
Lauder Avenue. But we will see as our discussion proceeds that it is
important to consider not just this intersection but some of the surrounding
highway system as well. For now, we'll define the segment of
most interest to us as the U.S. 95 corridor from State Highway 8 on the north to Palouse River Drive on the south.
We will also consider travel patterns that normally occur
during a typical weekday, while the University of Idaho is in session. Traffic volumes vary throughout this typical weekday, with peak periods
occurring during the morning and afternoon, with a secondary peak during the
midday. There are also mini-peak periods during class change times, but
these variations are not significant enough to consider for our analysis
here. We'll see later in the analysis, however, that there are other
time periods, such as during special university events, that traffic volumes
increase significantly and have a bearing on the results that we need to
consider.
While many people are concerned about the operation of the
intersection today, it is also important to consider how the intersection is
likely to operate in the future. The investment in signal controllers
and related equipment is sizable, and its feasibility must be justified by
looking at both conditions present today and those likely to exist in the
future. For this reason, we will also consider future traffic volume
projections for the U.S. 95 corridor. [ Back ] [ Continue ] with Getting Started |
Page Break
Home
>
Getting Started > Page 2 of 5
Getting Started
Stakeholders
The Idaho Transportation Department has primary authority for the
operation of U.S. 95. It does all of the planning, design, and maintenance of
this highway. However, it works closely with the staff from the City
of Moscow so that, as much as possible, decisions regarding the state
highway facilities within city limits are made jointly between the city and
the state. As we develop the results from our analyses, the major
audience, then, will be the engineering staffs from these two agencies.
In addition, residents of the city will need to understand
the rationale for any final decision that is made regarding the intersection
and whether a signal should be installed or not. This points up an
important issue in any technical analysis. While any analysis must be
technically sound and based on standard methods of professional practice, it
must also be presented in such a way that it is understandable by decision
makers and elected officials (who often do not have technical backgrounds)
as well as the general public. This is particularly important as we
consider such concepts as level of service, and as we talk about sensitivity
analysis and the relative certainty that we have in our final results.
Goals
The major reason for conducting the analyses that makes up this case
study is to provide decision makers with sufficient information about the
performance of the intersection of U.S. 95/Styner Avenue/Lauder Avenue so that
they can decide whether the intersection should be signalized or whether it
should remain stop-sign controlled. The Highway Capacity Manual provides
estimates of delay, volume/capacity ratio, queue length, and other data that
are helpful to decision-makers in making this kind of decision.
We
should also point out that the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
is commonly used to determine if a signal is warranted and in most
jurisdictions is the legal document used to determine many of the
characteristics of a design. However, it is also useful to compare the
forecasted operations of an intersection under different control scenarios. The Highway Capacity Manual provides the tools for such an operational
analysis.
[ Back ]
with Getting Started |
Page Break
Home
>
Getting Started > Page 3 of 5
Getting Started
Performance Measures
The Highway Capacity Manual provides several performance measures for
intersections, both signalized and unsignalized. For both of these
types of intersections, the primary measure of effectiveness is control
delay. Control delay is directly related to level of service, a range
of levels that categorize performance from the point of view of the driver,
or the user of the highway system. Level of service (along with delay)
will be used here to help us determine if the intersection of U.S. 95/Styner
Avenue/Lauder Avenue should be changed from stop sign control to signal
control.
We will also need to consider other performance measures
besides just level of service in order to fully judge the overall
performance characteristics of the intersection. Depending on the type of
control at the intersection, these may include the volume/capacity ratio of
the critical movements at the intersection, the traffic signal cycle length,
and/or queue length considerations.
Analyses
We must complete several computations in order to gather the required
information on the performance of the U.S. 95/Styner-Lauder Avenue
under both stop sign and signal control. For convenience, we've
divided the analyses into six parts or problems. We will consider
each problem separately. We will also see that each problem consists
of several separate computations, using the Highway Capacity Manual or other
tools, such as TRANSYT 7F or CORSIM.
In
Problem 1,
we will study the intersection under both stop sign and signal control under
both present and future traffic conditions, for the typical weekday found in
Moscow, Idaho.
In
Problem 2, we will consider these same conditions, but
within the context of the U.S. 95 arterial as a whole. Here, we will
particularly focus on the effect that the adjacent intersections have on the
U.S.
95/Styner-Lauder Avenue intersection, and how a new signal at this
intersection must operate in conjunction with the adjacent signalized
intersections.
In
Problem 3, we will consider other time periods,
including traffic volumes during special events at the University of Idaho
and during different times of the year, when the mix of vehicles in the
traffic stream changes.
In
Problem 4, we will consider how we can forecast the
performance of the U.S. 95/Styner-Lauder Avenue intersection when an
actuated traffic controller is used.
In
Problem 5, we will consider the operation of the
highway outside the city limits, where it is operating as a two-lane highway.
In
Problem 6, we will consider the less detailed planning
analysis and what information it can tell us about future operations of the
intersection and the corridor.
with Getting Started |
Page Break
Home
>
Getting Started > Page 4 of 5
Getting Started
Tools
Most of the computations that we conduct in this case study will be with
the Highway Capacity Manual, particularly those chapters that deal with
intersection and arterial operations. This includes Chapter 15 (Urban
Streets), Chapter 16 (Signalized Intersections), and Chapter 17
(Unsignalized Intersections).
For some parts of the
analyses, however, and for certain traffic conditions, we will consider the
use of other tools. There are a variety of software tools available
that we could use, and for illustrative purposes we will demonstrate the use
of only two, TRANSYT 7F and CORSIM. TRANSYT 7F is a macroscopic flow
model that consider the progression of traffic platoons from one
intersection to the next. CORSIM is a microscopic traffic model that
considers the movement of individual vehicles along an arterial and the
details of actuated traffic controller operations. Other software packages
could also be applied with equal effectiveness. Data
Three kinds of data are generally needed for traffic analysis.
Demand or volume information specifies the turning movement flows (usually
in vehicles per hour) at each intersection approach. Intersection
geometry includes the number and configuration of lanes at an intersection
and along an arterial. Control conditions include information about
the traffic signal system, including signal timing and phasing data.
The data for each problem can be found at the links provided
below. These links are also provided in each of the problems, as you
need to access them.
U.S. 95/Styner Avenue/Lauder Avenue
U.S. 95/Styner Avenue/Lauder Avenue, during
special university events
U.S. 95/Styner Avenue/Lauder Avenue, during summer periods
U.S. 95/Sweet Avenue U.S. 95/Palouse River Drive
U.S. 95/State Highway 8
U.S. 95 arterial data
with Getting Started |
Page Break
Home
>
Getting Started > Page 5 of 5
Getting Started
Technical Issues
The computational procedures of the Highway Capacity Manual are complex,
often including a number of default values or assumptions that need to be
understood (and sometimes modified) if the procedures are to be applied
correctly to specific problems.
This case study
presents, and hopefully clarifies, a number of technical issues that often
arise in the application of chapters 15, 16, and 17 of the HCM. A
searchable index of the issues and important key words addressed in this and
other case studies within the HCMAG is provided near the bottom of the table
of contents located in the left margin of this page and labeled as "Search".
[ Continue ] to Problem 1 |
|