| Sub-problem 5b - Page 5 of 5 | ID# C105B05 | 
      
      
     
    Sub-problem 5b: Future 
    Analysis of 10-Mile 
      Segment of U.S. 95 With 
        Direct Recognition of the Hamlet
    What volumes should 
      be used in the future conditions analysis? 
    Since the future conditions do not yet exist in the hamlet, we must project 
    or forecast the expected traffic conditions, estimate the resulting intersecting volumes, and do
      the capacity analysis as outlined previously.
    
     
    Exhibit 1-44 
    shows the intersecting volumes that have been projected. For this analysis, 
    the volumes into and out of each cross street were estimated on the basis of 
    the types and densities of land uses that each cross street is expected to 
    serve.  
    
    What additional assumptions are necessary for the analysis? 
    Exhibit 1-45
    shows the results from analysis of the five unsignalized intersections. You can click
      here to see the five datasets. Additional information necessary 
    to this analysis included assumptions regarding the 
    peak hour factor, heavy 
    vehicle percentages, and geometry.
      
        
        
          
            | 
            Exhibit 1-45. 
            
            Intersection Delays 
            by Approach and Movement  
             (Click 
            here for Datasets) | 
          
            | Intersection | Delays by Approach 
            (sec/veh) | 
          
            | East | West | North | South | 
          
            | LTR | LTR | L | TR | L | TR | 
          
            | #1 (North) | 22.8 | 19.6 | 8.7 | 0.0 | 9.2 | 0.3 | 
          
            | #2 | 26.4 | 24.3 | 8.9 | 0.1 | 9.2 | 0.4 | 
          
            | #3 | 32.0 | 25.9 | 9.1 | 0.7 | 9.1 | 0.3 | 
          
            | #4 | 24.6 | 22.7 | 9.1 | 0.3 | 8.9 | 0.2 | 
          
            | #5 (South) | 22.9 | 18.6 | 9.0 | 0.2 | 8.8 | 0.1 | 
        
     
       You probably recall 
      that the HCM unsignalized intersection analysis procedure assumes the Rank 
      1 through and right-turning movements on the major street don't yield to 
      any other movements. Why, then, is there a small amount of delay reported 
      in Exhibit 1-45 for these movements (NB through/right and SB 
      through/right)? The answer lies in the fact that, on this particular 
      two-lane highway, no separate lane is provided for vehicles turning left 
      from the major street onto the minor streets. When no left-turn pocket is 
      provided on the major street, a delayed left-turn vehicle will 
      occasionally block the Rank 1 vehicles behind it. The HCM procedure 
      accounts for this delay to Rank 1 vehicles, as shown in Exhibit 1-45.
       For 
      the purpose of this sub-problem, we have assumed the default values presented 
      in Chapter 17 for unsignalized intersections.
      In addition to these default values, we used the intersecting volumes
      shown in 
      Exhibit 1-44, a PHF of 0.88, 10% trucks, and 
      flares of 2, 3, 2, 1,
      and 1 vehicle at intersections 1-5 respectively
    based on geometric data collected in the field.
    [ Back ] [
    Continue ] to 
    sub-problem 5c