| Linked Terms | Case Study |
| 3-legged roundabout | Dade County, Florida |
| a | Moscow, Idaho |
| A ring | Clifton Park, New York |
| access density | Dade County, Florida |
| accuracy | Moscow, Idaho |
| actuated | Clifton Park, New York |
| actuated control | Moscow, Idaho |
| ADT | Dade County, Florida |
| all-walk phase | Clifton Park, New York |
| Analyses | Moscow, Idaho |
| analysis | Clifton Park, New York |
| Annual Daily Traffic | Dade County, Florida |
| arrival possibility | Moscow, Idaho |
| arrival type | Moscow, Idaho |
| arrival type changes | Clifton Park, New York |
| arterial level of service | Dade County, Florida |
| arterial street class | Dade County, Florida |
| ATS | Dade County, Florida |
| Average travel speed | Dade County, Florida |
| B ring | Clifton Park, New York |
| base free flow speed | Dade County, Florida |
| By-pass | Moscow, Idaho |
| c | Moscow, Idaho |
| capacity | Moscow, Idaho |
| capacity vs. conflicting volume | Dade County, Florida |
| circulating volume | Dade County, Florida |
| Class I | Dade County, Florida |
| Class I signalized arterial | Dade County, Florida |
| Class I signalized arterial operational analysis | Dade County, Florida |
| Class II | Dade County, Florida |
| Clifton Country Road | Clifton Park, New York |
| CMA | Moscow, Idaho |
| Conflicting Flow | Moscow, Idaho |
| Control Conditions | Moscow, Idaho |
| Control Delay | Moscow, Idaho |
| Coordinated Actuated Control | Moscow, Idaho |
| Coordination with protected left turns | Moscow, Idaho |
| CORSIM | Moscow, Idaho |
| critical gap | Moscow, Idaho |
| critical gap | Dade County, Florida |
| Critical movement analysis | Moscow, Idaho |
| Critical movement analysis | Dade County, Florida |
| Critical movement technique | Clifton Park, New York |
| Critical movement technique | Dade County, Florida |
| Cycle Failures | Moscow, Idaho |
| Cycle Length | Dade County, Florida |
| Data | Moscow, Idaho |
| Data sensitivity | Clifton Park, New York |
| Delay upper limit | Gainesville, Florida |
| Demand | Moscow, Idaho |
| Demand exceeds capacity | Moscow, Idaho |
| Demand vs. Volume | Clifton Park, New York |
| Demand/Volume Information | Moscow, Idaho |
| Diverge | Clifton Park, New York |
| Diverge | Clifton Park, New York |
| Double Cycle | Gainesville, Florida |
| Effective Green Time | Moscow, Idaho |
| Equal Delay Strategy | Dade County, Florida |
| Equal v/c Strategy | Dade County, Florida |
| Equivalent Phase Times | Moscow, Idaho |
| Exclusive Pedestrian Phase | Gainesville, Florida |
| Facility Class | Dade County, Florida |
| Facility Type | Dade County, Florida |
| FDOT | Dade County, Florida |
| Flared Approach | Moscow, Idaho |
| Flashing don't walk | Clifton Park, New York |
| Florida Department of Transportation | Dade County, Florida |
| FLU | Clifton Park, New York |
| Follow-Up Time | Dade County, Florida |
| Free Flow Speed | Moscow, Idaho |
| Free-Flowing Right Turns | Dade County, Florida |
| Fully Actuated | Clifton Park, New York |
| Future Conditions | Moscow, Idaho |
| Goals | Moscow, Idaho |
| Goals and Objectives | Clifton Park, New York |
| Grade-Separated Flyover | Dade County, Florida |
| Green Ratio | Moscow, Idaho |
| Growth Sensitivity | Clifton Park, New York |
| Hamlet | Moscow, Idaho |
| Heavy Vehicles | Moscow, Idaho |
| Highway | Dade County, Florida |
| Highway Classification | Moscow, Idaho |
| Horizon Year | Moscow, Idaho |
| Intersection Geometry | Moscow, Idaho |
| Intersection Spacing | Dade County, Florida |
| Interstate 87 Interchange | Clifton Park, New York |
| k-parameter | Dade County, Florida |
| Krome Avenue | Dade County, Florida |
| Lane Configuration | Moscow, Idaho |
| Lane Group Definitions | Clifton Park, New York |
| lane utilization | Clifton Park, New York |
| Linear Growth Rate | Dade County, Florida |
| Logarithmic Growth Rate | Dade County, Florida |
| LOS | Moscow, Idaho |
| Lost Time | Moscow, Idaho |
| Lost Time | Clifton Park, New York |
| Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices | Dade County, Florida |
| Maximum Green Time | Dade County, Florida |
| Maximum Phase Times | Moscow, Idaho |
| Merge | Clifton Park, New York |
| Merge | Clifton Park, New York |
| Merging Analysis | Dade County, Florida |
| Microscopic Simulation Model | Moscow, Idaho |
| Mid-block Driveways | Moscow, Idaho |
| Minimum Delay Strategy | Dade County, Florida |
| Minimum Phase Times | Moscow, Idaho |
| Mitigation | Clifton Park, New York |
| Moe Road | Clifton Park, New York |
| Movement | Moscow, Idaho |
| Multimodal corridor | Gainesville, Florida |
| Museum Road | Gainesville, Florida |
| Museum Road bus stops | Gainesville, Florida |
| Museum Road Scope | Gainesville, Florida |
| MUTCD | Moscow, Idaho |
| MUTCD | Dade County, Florida |
| NEMA Controllers | Clifton Park, New York |
| Not Opposed | Moscow, Idaho |
| off-ramp | Clifton Park, New York |
| Okeechobee Road | Dade County, Florida |
| on-ramp | Clifton Park, New York |
| Operational analysis Class I or II two lane highway | Dade County, Florida |
| Optimal Green Time | Dade County, Florida |
| Oversaturated Conditions | Moscow, Idaho |
| Parametric Study | Clifton Park, New York |
| Peak Hour | Clifton Park, New York |
| Peak Hour | Clifton Park, New York |
| Peak Hour Factor | Moscow, Idaho |
| peak hour factor | Clifton Park, New York |
| pedestrian activity | Dade County, Florida |
| pedestrian push-buttons | Clifton Park, New York |
| pedestrians | Clifton Park, New York |
| pedestrians | Gainesville, Florida |
| percent time spent following | Dade County, Florida |
| performance measures | Moscow, Idaho |
| permitted | Moscow, Idaho |
| phase | Clifton Park, New York |
| phase | Clifton Park, New York |
| phase overlap | Clifton Park, New York |
| phasing | Clifton Park, New York |
| PHF | Clifton Park, New York |
| planning analysis | Moscow, Idaho |
| planning analysis | Clifton Park, New York |
| planning Class I two-lane highway analysis | Dade County, Florida |
| Planning Class II two-lane highway analysis | Dade County, Florida |
| planning level highway analysis | Dade County, Florida |
| platoons | Moscow, Idaho |
| posted speed | Dade County, Florida |
| pre-timed vs. actuated control | Moscow, Idaho |
| progression band | Moscow, Idaho |
| progression factor | Gainesville, Florida |
| protected | Moscow, Idaho |
| protected plus permitted | Moscow, Idaho |
| PTSF | Moscow, Idaho |
| PTSF | Dade County, Florida |
| QEM | Dade County, Florida |
| queue length | Moscow, Idaho |
| quick estimation method | Moscow, Idaho |
| quick estimation procedures | Moscow, Idaho |
| ramp termini | Clifton Park, New York |
| random arrivals | Moscow, Idaho |
| Rietz Union Drive Intersection | Gainesville, Florida |
| Right turns on red | Clifton Park, New York |
| roundabout | Dade County, Florida |
| Route 146 | Clifton Park, New York |
| Route 146 arterial study | Clifton Park, New York |
| RTOR | Clifton Park, New York |
| saturation flow rate | Moscow, Idaho |
| Scope | Moscow, Idaho |
| scope | Clifton Park, New York |
| semi-actuated control | Gainesville, Florida |
| semi-direct | Clifton Park, New York |
| service volume | Moscow, Idaho |
| service volume tables | Dade County, Florida |
| Shenendehowa campus | Clifton Park, New York |
| si | Clifton Park, New York |
| signal coordination | Moscow, Idaho |
| signal coordination | Gainesville, Florida |
| signal density | Dade County, Florida |
| signal phasing design | Gainesville, Florida |
| signal timing data | Clifton Park, New York |
| signal timing plan | Moscow, Idaho |
| signal timing plan strategies | Dade County, Florida |
| signal timing strategies | Dade County, Florida |
| signal warrants | Moscow, Idaho |
| signal warrants | Dade County, Florida |
| signalized arterials | Dade County, Florida |
| signalized intersection | Clifton Park, New York |
| signalized intersection w/ peds | Gainesville, Florida |
| single lane roundabout | Dade County, Florida |
| skipped phases | Clifton Park, New York |
| skipped phases | Clifton Park, New York |
| sneakers | Moscow, Idaho |
| sneakers | Dade County, Florida |
| stakeholders | Moscow, Idaho |
| stakeholders | Clifton Park, New York |
| stakeholders | Gainesville, Florida |
| start-up lost time | Clifton Park, New York |
| stop-controlled analysis | Dade County, Florida |
| striping | Moscow, Idaho |
| technical issues | Moscow, Idaho |
| terrain type | Dade County, Florida |
| TIA | Clifton Park, New York |
| time period | Moscow, Idaho |
| time-space diagram | Moscow, Idaho |
| tools | Moscow, Idaho |
| traffic growth | Clifton Park, New York |
| traffic impact analysis | Clifton Park, New York |
| traffic-actuated control | Moscow, Idaho |
| Transportation Research Circular 212 | Moscow, Idaho |
| Transyt 7F | Clifton Park, New York |
| two-stage gap acceptance | Dade County, Florida |
| two-lane highway class | Dade County, Florida |
| two-lane highway level of service | Dade County, Florida |
| two-lane rural highway | Dade County, Florida |
| TWSC | Moscow, Idaho |
| TWSC analysis | Gainesville, Florida |
| twsc intersection w/peds | Gainesville, Florida |
| TWSC LOS | Moscow, Idaho |
| U.S. 95 schematic | Moscow, Idaho |
| uncertainty | Moscow, Idaho |
| uncertainty | Clifton Park, New York |
| unit extension | Moscow, Idaho |
| unit extension | Moscow, Idaho |
| unit extension | Moscow, Idaho |
| unit extension | Gainesville, Florida |
| University of Florida | Gainesville, Florida |
| unsignalized intersection analysis | Clifton Park, New York |
| urban street LOS | Dade County, Florida |
| v | Moscow, Idaho |
| v/c | Moscow, Idaho |
| v/c ratio | Moscow, Idaho |